Is peer review in academic publishing still working?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Academic publishing is electronic publishing
Derk Haank began by saying that he wanted to keep his presentation simple and would make only a few statements. The first of these was to say that, although it might be stating the obvious, academic publishing is electronic publishing. It has been remarkable how quickly things have progressed since the invention of the Web, and an EC study recently recognised that the revolution in electronic p...
متن کاملIs WM still working ? 1 Is Working Memory still working ?
Is WM still working? 3 The term working memory appears to have been first proposed by Miller, Galanter and Pribram (1960) in their classic book Plans and the Structure of Behavior. The term has subsequently been used in computational modelling approaches (Newell & Simon, 1972), and in animal learning studies, in which the participant animals are required to hold information across a number of t...
متن کاملIs working memory still working?
The current state of A. D. Baddeley and G. J. Hitch's (1974) multicomponent working memory model is reviewed. The phonological and visuospatial subsystems have been extensively investigated, leading both to challenges over interpretation of individual phenomena and to more detailed attempts to model the processes underlying the subsystems. Analysis of the controlling central executive has prove...
متن کاملPeer Review in Academic Promotion and Publishing: Its Meaning, Locus and Future
Since 2005, and with generous support from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, The Future of Scholarly Communication Project at UC Berkeley's Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE) has been exploring how academic values—including those related to peer review, publishing, sharing, and collaboration—influence scholarly communication practices and engagement with new technological affordances, open...
متن کاملIs peer review still the content industry's upper house?
Key points • Although ‘peer review’ has quasi-sacred status, times are changing, and peer review is not necessarily a single and uniformly reliable gold standard. • For publishers, peer review is a process not an outcome. • Academics understand peer review, but are often ignorant about the quality checking mechanisms within wider publishing. • Self-publishing has led to the much wider availabil...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Open Review of Educational Research
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2326-5507
DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139